Vizua vs Squoosh: Which Image Compression Tool Is Better in 2026?
Vizua and Squoosh share something unusual: both process images entirely in your browser. No uploads, no servers, no waiting for a round trip. But they take very different approaches to what that local processing should do.
What Each Tool Does
Squoosh is an image compression app built by Google Chrome Labs. It launched in 2018 as an open-source project to showcase modern browser capabilities. You drop in one image, choose a codec, adjust encoding parameters, and compare the result side-by-side with the original using a slider. It supports JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, JPEG XL, and several other codecs.
Vizua is a suite of 71 image tools. Compression is one of many features — the platform also covers format conversion, resizing, cropping, effects, filters, text overlays, social media presets, batch processing, and AI-powered tools like background removal and OCR text extraction. All processing happens locally on your device.
Compression: Head to Head
Both tools produce excellent compression results. Here is where they differ:
| Aspect | Vizua | Squoosh |
|---|---|---|
| JPEG compression | Yes — quality slider with preview | Yes — advanced encoder with granular controls |
| PNG compression | Yes — optimized lossless | Yes — advanced lossless optimizer |
| WebP compression | Yes — lossy and lossless | Yes — with detailed parameter tuning |
| AVIF support | Yes — convert to AVIF | Yes — full AVIF encoding |
| JPEG XL | No | Yes (experimental) |
| Side-by-side preview | Before/after with file size | Slider comparison with pixel-level detail |
| Codec parameter control | Quality slider (simplified) | Full codec-level parameters |
Squoosh gives you deeper control over encoding parameters — things like chroma subsampling, effort level, and specific codec flags. This is valuable for developers who need to squeeze every kilobyte out of a hero image. Vizua takes a simpler approach: adjust a quality slider, see the result, download. For most use cases, the quality difference between the two is imperceptible.
If you want to understand the technical differences between compression methods, see our guide on lossy vs lossless compression.
Batch Processing
This is where the tools diverge sharply.
Squoosh processes one image at a time. Period. The web app does not support batch uploads. Batch processing has been the most requested feature on GitHub since 2018, with multiple open issues and hundreds of upvotes. The CLI that once supported batch operations was deprecated in 2023. A community fork exists, but it requires technical setup.
Vizua supports batch processing for JPEG compression, PNG compression, WebP compression, and format conversion tools. Drop multiple files, configure settings once, process all of them, and download individually or as a zip. If you regularly compress more than one image at a time, this is a practical advantage.
Beyond Compression
Squoosh is a compression tool. Vizua is a full image editing platform. Here is the scope difference:
| Feature | Vizua | Squoosh |
|---|---|---|
| Compression | JPEG, PNG, WebP | JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, JPEG XL, more |
| Resize | Yes (with presets) | Yes (basic) |
| Crop | Yes | No |
| Format conversion | 15+ format pairs | Between supported codecs |
| Image effects | 20+ (blur, sepia, duotone, etc.) | No |
| Text on image | Yes | No |
| Background removal | Yes (AI-powered) | No |
| OCR text extraction | Yes | No |
| Social media presets | Instagram, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, YouTube | No |
| EXIF viewer | Yes | No |
| Batch processing | Yes (select tools) | No |
| Total tools | 71 | 1 (compression + resize) |
Squoosh is not trying to be a full editor. It does one thing and does it well. Vizua is built for users who need compression as part of a broader image workflow — and want everything in one place. For more on how format choice affects your images, see WebP vs AVIF.
Privacy and Architecture
Both tools share the same core promise: your images never leave your device. No upload, no server processing, no temporary cloud storage.
Squoosh achieves this using advanced codecs compiled to run in the browser. Vizua uses optimized algorithms and modern browser technologies for all 71 tools. In both cases, the processing happens on your CPU and GPU. If you close the tab, the data is gone.
This makes both tools suitable for sensitive images — client work, medical photos, legal documents, personal photos you would rather not send over the internet. For a deeper look at why this matters, read why most image tools upload your photos and our guide on protecting your privacy when editing images.
UX and Workflow
Squoosh's interface is minimal and focused. You see your image, a quality slider, a codec selector, and a live comparison. Everything fits on one screen. There is no navigation to learn — you are compressing within seconds of landing on the page.
Vizua organizes 71 tools by category (compress, convert, edit, effects, AI tools, social media). Each tool has its own page with a dedicated interface. The trade-off is that you navigate between tool pages instead of having everything in one view. The upside is that each tool is purpose-built for its task.
The Bottom Line
Choose Squoosh if you compress one image at a time and want granular codec control. It is the best single-image compression tool available in a browser — especially for AVIF and JPEG XL experimentation.
Choose Vizua if you need batch compression, multiple formats, or any image editing beyond compression. The 71-tool suite covers everything from JPEG compression to background removal to social media resizing — all with the same client-side privacy guarantee.
Both tools are free. Both keep your files private. The choice comes down to whether you need a scalpel (Squoosh) or a toolbox (Vizua).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Squoosh still maintained in 2026?
The Squoosh web app at squoosh.app is still maintained by Google Chrome Labs. However, the Squoosh CLI tool was deprecated in 2023 due to staffing constraints. The web interface continues to work and receive updates, though development has slowed compared to its early years.
Which tool has better compression quality?
For single-image compression with fine-grained control, Squoosh gives you more codec parameters to adjust. For practical results on common formats like JPEG, PNG, and WebP, both tools produce excellent output. The visual difference is negligible for most users — Squoosh offers more knobs to turn, while Vizua gives you a simple quality slider and handles the rest.
Can Vizua compress to AVIF like Squoosh?
Yes. Vizua supports AVIF conversion through its Convert to AVIF tool. Squoosh also supports AVIF encoding. Both tools handle the conversion in your browser without uploading files. Squoosh additionally supports experimental codecs like JPEG XL and WebP v2.
Does Squoosh support batch processing?
No. Squoosh processes one image at a time in the web app. Batch processing has been the most requested feature on their GitHub for years, but it has not been added. The CLI that supported batch processing was deprecated in 2023. Vizua supports batch processing for select tools including compression and format conversion.
Are both tools really free with no upload?
Yes. Both Squoosh and Vizua process images entirely in your browser. No files are sent to any server. Both are free to use with no account required. The difference is scope: Squoosh focuses on compression and format conversion, while Vizua offers 71 tools including editing, effects, and AI features.
Try Vizua free — no upload, no limits
Compress JPEG, PNG, and WebP images in your browser. Batch support included.